[Talk-us] Route Relation Nitpicking

[Phil! Gold]

* Apollinaris Schoell <aschoell at gmail.com> [2010-06-17 08:26 -0700]:
> mentioned earlier already. the ref tag is taken by a standardization in
> osm worldwide.

Agreed.  I think we have to use the ref on roads in the same way as it's
always been, with the network and route number combined.

I think that the network and route number better off separated in general,
however, especially since we use the shield graphics as the route
identifiers in the US.  The wiki agrees with me with respect to the
tagging of route relations.  I just wanted to see if there was general
consensus around the wiki's documentation.  Since it seems that there is,
I'll probably update the refs on some of the route relations as I notice
them.

-- 
...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/
PGP: 026A27F2  print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248  9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2
--- --
A.D. 1492: Christopher Columbus arrives in what he believes to be "India",
           but which RMS informs him is actually "GNU/India".
                       -- The history of the world, according to Yu Suzuki
---- --- --