[Talk-us] Highway Tagging Consensus to Improve OSM (and address some of 41 latitude's concerns)
ian.dees at gmail.com
Sat Oct 23 22:46:01 BST 2010
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
> On 10/23/2010 10:39 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com
> > <mailto:neroute2 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Phil! Gold
> > <phil_g at pobox.com
> > <mailto:phil_g at pobox.com>> wrote:
> > > Do you know whether other states have
> > > similar official standards for such things (and whether they're
> > publically
> > > available)?
> > Some states may, while others don't seem to have a single standard
> > abbreviation.
> > Prefix information should not go in OSM. If a renderer wants to display
> > a prefix somehow, then they can go look it up based on other information
> > given in the other tags on the relation.
> That works out great. Until you have situations where two routes in
> different networks have the same number intersect or run closely parallel.
Not a problem if each route is a different relation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-us