[Talk-us] County road network relations (was: REF tags for State Highways on ways)

Kristian M Zoerhoff kristian.zoerhoff at gmail.com
Sun Apr 10 22:00:28 BST 2011


On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 10:42:43AM -0400, Richard Weait wrote:
> 
> ref=number portion only
> network=countrycode_statecode_[location details as required]networkcode_variant
> 
> Interstate 95. ref=95; network=us_i
> US 66 historic. ref=66; network=us_us_historic
> York Regional Road 8. ref=8; network=ca_on_york

What's the consensus for county roads in the US?

Right now, my home county (Kane, IL) has a very well mapped and signed 
county road network, but the data is buried in the name_1 tag in OSM, thanks 
to TIGER. I've planned to move these to relations, but I haven't seen any 
other county-level networks, so I'd like to get the syntax right before I 
dive in.

Would it be:

Big Timber Road. network=us_il_kane

I don't want ref tags on these, as the shields will quickly get too 
cluttered in Mapnik.

-- 

Kristian Zoerhoff
kristian.zoerhoff at gmail.com



More information about the Talk-us mailing list