[Talk-us] County road network relations (was: REF tags for State Highways on ways)
Kristian M Zoerhoff
kristian.zoerhoff at gmail.com
Sun Apr 10 22:00:28 BST 2011
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 10:42:43AM -0400, Richard Weait wrote:
>
> ref=number portion only
> network=countrycode_statecode_[location details as required]networkcode_variant
>
> Interstate 95. ref=95; network=us_i
> US 66 historic. ref=66; network=us_us_historic
> York Regional Road 8. ref=8; network=ca_on_york
What's the consensus for county roads in the US?
Right now, my home county (Kane, IL) has a very well mapped and signed
county road network, but the data is buried in the name_1 tag in OSM, thanks
to TIGER. I've planned to move these to relations, but I haven't seen any
other county-level networks, so I'd like to get the syntax right before I
dive in.
Would it be:
Big Timber Road. network=us_il_kane
I don't want ref tags on these, as the shields will quickly get too
cluttered in Mapnik.
--
Kristian Zoerhoff
kristian.zoerhoff at gmail.com
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list