[Talk-us] County road network relations

[Kristian Zoerhoff]

Ah, I didn't realize the rules varied by highway class. These are all
tertiary, so this should work out OK.

--
Kristian M Zoerhoff
On Apr 10, 2011 5:41 PM, "Nathan Edgars II" <neroute2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/10/2011 6:34 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
>> that must be a lot of county roads, i haven't perceived a clutter problem
>> in Rensselaer County, and i have used ref tags ("CR 9" for county route
>> 9) everywhere. note that if you zoom out, mapnik is smart enough to
>> disappear the county route ref tags past a certain point.
>
> Disappear the tertiary ref tags, that is (at zoom 12). Secondaries
> disappear at zoom 11, primaries and trunks at 10, and all refs are gone
> at zoom 9. Of course, at any zoom level, it doesn't try to put shields
> in where they won't fit.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20110410/8f90e830/attachment.html>