[Talk-us] Now you can see how much vandalism the OSMF will carry out on April Fools

[andrzej zaborowski]

Hi Grant,

On 14 December 2011 21:48, Humphries, Grant <HumphriG at trimet.org> wrote:
> It was mentioned balrog-kun’s automated edits are exempted from being
> reverted.  Can anyone expand on that or point me in the direction to find
> more information about this?  Does anyone have an idea of what percentage of
> edits done from that account were automated?

The changesets tagged bot=yes are automated and it was mentioned
somewhere in LWG minutes that those could be relicensed.  They're not
100% automated, but mostly (i.e. about a day of manual review went
into each of the abbreviations expanding changesets).  AFAIK
Frederik's visualization tool already treats those changesets as
clean.

It is a small percentage of my edits changeset-count-wise but they are
large changesets so it's a notable percentage data wise.

(I hope my other changesets will not be reverted either but it's hard
to tell right now with the amount of false assumptions made in the
license change process)
Cheers