[Talk-us] Relations, cycle routes, shapefiles

[Nathan Edgars II]

On 2/5/2011 10:44 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
 > On 02/04/2011 01:42 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
 >> On 2/3/2011 11:15 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
 >>> underlying ways
 >>> often have refs that belong to them (like bridge numbers) but not the
 >>> route itself.
 >> You've said this a number of times without explanation. Why does the
 >> bridge number, or ODOT's internal referencing, "belong" to the way,
 >> while the route number doesn't?
 >
 > Oregon considers highway numbers and route numbers differently.

I know. So what would you do on a bridge on a route, which has both a 
bridge number and a route number?
 >
 >>> Bike boulevards are on the same network as each other (well, the
 >>> Portland ones, are, at any rate; note I'm not referring to official
 >>> routes for state highways like 99 or federal highways like 205 or 84
 >>> since you're talking about city bike boulevards).
 >>
 >> Speaking of this, I don't think it's appropriate to mark the cycleways
 >> that parallel I-84 and I-205 as ncn just because they parallel highways
 >> on the national motor network.
 >
 > Never mind Oregon gets federal dollars to maintain those third roadways
 > for those federal ways, eh?

What does this have to do with anything?