[Talk-us] Relations, cycle routes, shapefiles
Paul Johnson
baloo at ursamundi.org
Sun Feb 6 03:44:10 GMT 2011
On 02/04/2011 01:42 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 2/3/2011 11:15 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> underlying ways
>> often have refs that belong to them (like bridge numbers) but not the
>> route itself.
> You've said this a number of times without explanation. Why does the
> bridge number, or ODOT's internal referencing, "belong" to the way,
> while the route number doesn't?
Oregon considers highway numbers and route numbers differently.
>> Bike boulevards are on the same network as each other (well, the
>> Portland ones, are, at any rate; note I'm not referring to official
>> routes for state highways like 99 or federal highways like 205 or 84
>> since you're talking about city bike boulevards).
>
> Speaking of this, I don't think it's appropriate to mark the cycleways
> that parallel I-84 and I-205 as ncn just because they parallel highways
> on the national motor network.
Never mind Oregon gets federal dollars to maintain those third roadways
for those federal ways, eh?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20110205/7121fc0a/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list