[Talk-us] access=no with exceptions
osm at inbox.org
Fri Sep 9 02:27:42 BST 2011
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:19 PM, PJ Houser
<stephanie.jean.houser at gmail.com> wrote:
> In Portland, Oregon, we have been tagging certain ways with access
> restrictions as access=no and then explicit exceptions, like psv=yes,
> foot=yes, bicycle=yes.
Yes, this is correct.
> Here's an example of our work
As was pointed out by Nathan, this should probably be bus=yes, though
I disagree with him about using access=private. The sign says "buses
only", and I don't see any evidence that this is private property.
More information about the Talk-us