[Talk-us] [Imports] shawnee county landuse

[Mike Dupont]

On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Martin Koppenhöfer
<dieterdreist at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> Am 15/dic/2012 um 22:39 schrieb Mike  Dupont <
> jamesmikedupont at googlemail.com>:
>
> 3.       **What tagging are you proposing?
>>
> addr:* and landuse
> the only additional tag are the four detailed landuse tags
> eg
> lbcs:activity:code    {1100=1}
> lbcs:activity:name    {Household activities=1}
> lbcs:function:code    {1170=1}
> lbcs:function:name    {Garden apartment complex (1=1}
>
> These codes are details on how the lot is zoned. otherwise I am using this
> information for fixing the street names and zip codes.
>
> Are the landuses you plan to tag actual landuses or permitted/planned
> landuses?
>

These are actual landuses, the ones that describe the business.
when you register a business here in kansas, you have to provide this
information.
https://www.kansas.gov/bess/flow/main?execution=e1s1

I will also be looking into how that data can be extracted and compared
some day. This is more than zoning infomation.
If you look at this for example :
http://www.snco.us/Ap/C_prop/Listing.asp?PRCL_ID=0973604030001000

"2151-Grocery store / supermarket"
"2110-Goods-oriented shopping"
that is very accurate and could be used for direct tag information.

there is a building layer on the snco gis site, but I have not figured out
how to extract it, it seems to be hidden. So I am tracing them from bing.
http://gis.snco.us/ArcGIS/rest/services/Basemap_102100/MapServer/7
http://gis.snco.us/ArcGIS/rest/services/Basemap_102100/MapServer/8

****
>>
>> **4.       **The last few times someone has proposed importing property
>> lot data the consensus has been that that type of data shouldn’t be
>> imported into OSM. Why is this different?
>>
> I am importing the plots for zipcode, house number and address data. It is
> being used to tag the buildings, it can be deleted when it has been totally
> processed.
>
>
>
> IMHO addresses belong (often) to plots, so in these cases there is no
> point in transferring the address information to a building. Don't remember
> consensus to not import property limits. I do remember though that there
> were concerns about the sheer amount of data increase if we imported this
> for the whole world.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>

Well these are plots/property limits. And I dont want to import them for
the whole world, just the streets  that I am tracing buildings from so
that  I can quickly find locations. Also did you notice that
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ can now find house numbers accurately
for these streets I imported :
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/search.php?q=2033+Southwest+Wanamaker+Rd%2C+Topeka%2C+Kansas&viewbox=-217.97%2C80.28%2C217.97%2C-70.31

Until the houses are traced and the data transfered like i did here :

http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/196582551 I removed the plot and
the lbcs data and left only the house itself.
I forgot the landuse=residential.

-- 
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com
Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org
Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3
Free Software Foundation Europe Fellow http://fsfe.org/support/?h4ck3rm1k3
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20121216/60bf6ffd/attachment.html>