[Talk-us] Anyone want to team up to work on Austin, Texas (was LA and other license changeover challenged areas)

[andrzej zaborowski]

On 3 February 2012 06:00, Toby Murray <toby.murray at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:34 PM, andrzej zaborowski <balrogg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2 February 2012 19:28, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:02 AM, andrzej zaborowski <balrogg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 31 January 2012 18:51, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
>>>>> Looks like about 4% of Austin was balrog-kun; I'm in the process of tagging
>>>>> that odbl=clean right now per his previous request.
>>>>
>>>> I don't believe I made any non-automatic edits in TX, and those are
>>>> already considered clean by the license plugins.
>>>>
>>>> Note also that if you use odbl=clean you need to make sure other edits
>>>> in the history are ODbL-clean and as far as I know there's no general
>>>> way to do that.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Are they also considered clean on
>>> http://odbl.poole.ch/usa-20111208-20120201-poly.html ? There's still a
>>> whole lot of 'dirty' edits by you on there.
>>
>> 82k ways, so yes, looks like some of the name expansion changesets are
>> still counted dirty.  Simon Poole mentioned on IRC something may be a
>> little off in his latest stats.
>
> Well I just found 8 TIGER name expansion changesets that have a total
> of ~113,000 ways in them and weren't listed on the changeset override
> page because they didn't have the bot=yes tag.

Technically some of these are 100% manual edits.

Cheers