[Talk-us] Fresno has no primary roads

Dave Hansen dave at sr71.net
Tue Feb 14 19:17:54 GMT 2012


On 02/13/2012 05:19 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> It could just as easily be local mapping gone awry, by a local who
> thinks only state highways should be primary. The TIGER import would not
> have included any primaries, since there are no U.S. Highways in Fresno
> (though any such would be motorway).

Here were the a2* mappings from the original import, fwiw:

> #primary roads without limited access
> TIGER_TO_OSM[:a21] = {:highway => :primary, :"tiger:separated" => :no}
> TIGER_TO_OSM[:a22] = {:highway => :primary, :"tiger:separated" => :no, :tunnel => :yes}
> TIGER_TO_OSM[:a23] = {:highway => :primary, :"tiger:separated" => :no, :layer => -1}
> TIGER_TO_OSM[:a24] = {:highway => :primary, :"tiger:separated" => :no, :railway => :rail}
> TIGER_TO_OSM[:a25] = {:highway => :primary, :"tiger:separated" => :yes}
> TIGER_TO_OSM[:a26] = {:highway => :primary, :"tiger:separated" => :yes, :tunnel => :yes}
> TIGER_TO_OSM[:a27] = {:highway => :primary, :"tiger:separated" => :yes, :layer => -1}
> TIGER_TO_OSM[:a28] = {:highway => :primary, :"tiger:separated" => :yes, :railway => :rail}
> TIGER_TO_OSM[:a29] = {:highway => :primary, :bridge => :yes}




More information about the Talk-us mailing list