[Talk-us] Fwd: Re: Post bot cleanup
rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com
Sat Jul 21 04:37:22 BST 2012
Very nice Kai. However, I'd like to suggest a few more cities that might be of use for that.
Toronto, Ontario (mainly because you added Winnipeg)
> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 20:28:16 -0700
> From: kakrueger at gmail.com
> To: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Fwd: Re: Post bot cleanup
> Martijn van Exel-3 wrote
> >> The big problem though is automatically figuring out if routes are broken
> >> or
> >> not and then colour them red or green accordingly. At the moment it
> >> doesn't
> >> do this at all.
> >> Anyone have some good ideas for this?
> > The 'easiest' way I see is to compare those results with the same
> > calculation based on data from a week or a month old. Wherever the
> > difference in time / distance is more than a certain threshold, say 5
> > or 10%, the route needs to be looked at.
> OK, I have done something similar now, just that I used google calculated
> routes as a reference. Those routes that are more than 5% longer either in
> distance or time are flagged as red, others are green.
> This isn't perfect, but at least it gives a good first indication of which
> routes are broken and hopefully as people continue fixing the interstate
> system more and more routes will turn green.
> The updated version is at the same URL as before (
> http://apmon.dev.openstreetmap.org/us_routing_grid.html )
> View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Re-Fwd-Re-Post-bot-cleanup-tp5717310p5717675.html
> Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-us