[Talk-us] Remap-a-tron level 2 complete! Suggestions for level 3?

Martijn van Exel m at rtijn.org
Mon Oct 1 21:04:37 BST 2012


The setup involves designing the SQL queries and the initial database,
and tweaking the front end for different types of problems. Up until
now, we have been able to get away with just displaying the
non-remapped way as a vector element on the leaflet map, but for
example forfolding ways that may not be enough, as the folds may be
really tiny and not visible without also displaying the offending
piece of the way in a kind of magnifying glass (or in the popup
balloon). That would mean significant front-end tweaking as well as
partial re-engineering of the webservices that transmit the geojson.
(these are really really simple things[1] so that should not be hard
to do for someone with a little python / json experience). For the
connectivity errors, which are as high on my list as anything to fix,
we'd need to transmit both ways involved and find a way to display the
issue effectively. Maybe just the two ways in different colors. Nice
extra would be if the popup would say 'hey, there are x more
connectivity errors within a mile, do you just want to go ahead and
edit all of them?'

A wiki page is an excellent idea, who has time to set that up?

[1] https://github.com/mvexel/remapatron/blob/master/service/get.py

On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Dale Puch <dale.puch at gmail.com> wrote:
> For setting up the runs, is it all SQL queries or are there other items
> involved?  Perhaps start a wiki page for useful queries to identify problems
> (for this or other projects), or even just collaboration on plain text
> criteria ideas for future runs and build what is needed from there.
>
> Dale
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:
>>
>> Also a good one. I will make a list of all the suggestions some time
>> this week. There's some low hanging fruit here, and some more complex
>> ideas. I don't know when I will have time to implement the next level,
>> I hope to have something up before Portland. Any help is appreciated!
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Alexander Jones <happy5214 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Alan Millar wrote:
>> >
>> >> Another suggestion: motorways and trunks without lanes=number tags
>> >>
>> >> - Alan
>> >
>> > I'd help out with that.
>> >
>> > Alexander
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Talk-us mailing list
>> > Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> martijn van exel
>> http://oegeo.wordpress.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-us mailing list
>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dale Puch



-- 
martijn van exel
http://oegeo.wordpress.com



More information about the Talk-us mailing list