[Talk-us] Remap-a-tron level 2 complete! Suggestions for level 3?
dale.puch at gmail.com
Tue Oct 2 04:04:19 BST 2012
Well as a start is I put a section into the QA tools page
Several projects there that ideas/code/SQL might be borrowed from.
Well your obviously familiar with this :) did the issues found by this
query all get resolved?
Also some SQL from a bot http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Fixer that
might be of use in building other queries.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:
> The setup involves designing the SQL queries and the initial database,
> and tweaking the front end for different types of problems. Up until
> now, we have been able to get away with just displaying the
> non-remapped way as a vector element on the leaflet map, but for
> example forfolding ways that may not be enough, as the folds may be
> really tiny and not visible without also displaying the offending
> piece of the way in a kind of magnifying glass (or in the popup
> balloon). That would mean significant front-end tweaking as well as
> partial re-engineering of the webservices that transmit the geojson.
> (these are really really simple things so that should not be hard
> to do for someone with a little python / json experience). For the
> connectivity errors, which are as high on my list as anything to fix,
> we'd need to transmit both ways involved and find a way to display the
> issue effectively. Maybe just the two ways in different colors. Nice
> extra would be if the popup would say 'hey, there are x more
> connectivity errors within a mile, do you just want to go ahead and
> edit all of them?'
> A wiki page is an excellent idea, who has time to set that up?
>  https://github.com/mvexel/remapatron/blob/master/service/get.py
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Dale Puch <dale.puch at gmail.com> wrote:
> > For setting up the runs, is it all SQL queries or are there other items
> > involved? Perhaps start a wiki page for useful queries to identify
> > (for this or other projects), or even just collaboration on plain text
> > criteria ideas for future runs and build what is needed from there.
> > Dale
> > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:
> >> Also a good one. I will make a list of all the suggestions some time
> >> this week. There's some low hanging fruit here, and some more complex
> >> ideas. I don't know when I will have time to implement the next level,
> >> I hope to have something up before Portland. Any help is appreciated!
> >> Martijn
> >> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Alexander Jones <happy5214 at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Alan Millar wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Another suggestion: motorways and trunks without lanes=number tags
> >> >>
> >> >> - Alan
> >> >
> >> > I'd help out with that.
> >> >
> >> > Alexander
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Talk-us mailing list
> >> > Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> >> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
> >> --
> >> martijn van exel
> >> http://oegeo.wordpress.com
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Talk-us mailing list
> >> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
> > --
> > Dale Puch
> martijn van exel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-us