[Talk-us] Large area of deleted streets in Riverside, Calif.
rwelty at averillpark.net
Tue Sep 11 16:43:15 BST 2012
On 9/11/12 11:27 AM, Charlotte Wolter wrote:
> Yes, it looks really different. Thanks!
> If you have time, a few blocks further north, around Mission
> Boulevard, missing streets reappear.
> Actually the 2012 stuff looks better than earlier unedited
> TIGER. Maybe they are getting better?
a lot of the tiger looks the same, but for some of the really awful
areas, tiger 2011/12 looks a great
deal better. i'm planning on some selective replacement of unedited bad
tiger data with newer, better
tiger in upstate NY as i find areas where tiger has improved a lot.
Ian's tiger layers are invaluable for this as you can bring 2011 or 2012
directly up underneath the
imported ways and then toggle back and forth between imagery and the
tiger layers to see whether
there is a real improvement for an area.
More information about the Talk-us