[Talk-us] Bing imagery update

[Paul Johnson]

This seems to have some serious gaps in detail.  For example, most of
Portland and most of Tulsa is considered as having the same level of detail
imagery available.  Not so; I can barely make out centerlines and lane
lines on the highest level of detail for the Tulsa area, whereas in
Portland, I've read license plates on open trunk lids.


On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Clifford Snow <clifford at snowandsnow.us>wrote:

> Check out Bing Aerial Imagery Analyzer for OpenStreetMap,
> http://ant.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/. Someone posted a
> link about it on the Canadian talk list this morning. Another one of Martijn
> van Exel great contributions to OSM.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Alexander Jones <happy5214 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Mike N wrote:
>>
>> > In my part of SC, Bing imagery has updated!   Seems to be from this
>> > year; within the last month or so.
>>
>> New imagery in Fresno, too. When you're remapping rail yards, it's a
>> lifesaver.
>>
>> Alexander
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-us mailing list
>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Clifford
>
> OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20131209/60e4b06b/attachment.html>