[Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations
rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com
Thu Jul 11 17:57:21 UTC 2013
Is there picture proof of how they are signing it?
> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:43:47 -0400
> From: kkenny2 at nycap.rr.com
> To: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Phil! Gold <phil_g at pobox.com> wrote:
> > Given that previous list consensus was for tagging of the form:
> > network=US:I:Future
> > ref=<number>
> > modifier=Future
> > and that only one person offered a variant opinion this time around, I'd
> > recommend tagging as above.
> > Also, from your earlier emails, I have future interstates 26, 73,
> > 74, and
> > 840. Are there any others?
> 86 in New York, so signed for various segments of NY 17.
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-us