[Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations

James Mast rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com
Thu Jul 11 17:57:21 UTC 2013


Is there picture proof of how they are signing it?
 
-James
 
> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:43:47 -0400
> From: kkenny2 at nycap.rr.com
> To: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations
> 
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Phil! Gold <phil_g at pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> >     Given that previous list consensus was for tagging of the form:
> >
> >          network=US:I:Future
> >          ref=<number>
> >          modifier=Future
> >
> >     and that only one person offered a variant opinion this time around, I'd
> >     recommend tagging as above.
> >
> >     Also, from your earlier emails, I have future interstates 26, 73,
> >     74, and
> >     840.  Are there any others?
> 
> 86 in New York, so signed for various segments of NY 17.
> https://www.dot.ny.gov/regional-offices/multi/i-86
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20130711/c62bdc21/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list