[Talk-us] Admin boundary level quirk in NYC

John F. Eldredge john at jfeldredge.com
Sat May 18 14:49:04 UTC 2013


You might want to take a look at how Virginia is mapped.  Cities in Virginia are not considered to be subordinate to counties, even if surrounded on all sides by a county.  Towns, on the other hand, are subordinate to, and part of, counties.


Greg Troxel <gdt at ir.bbn.com> wrote:
> 
>   So I propose a different schema:
> 
>   New York Boroughs: 9
>   Cities (incl. NYC): 8
>   Counties: 6
> 
> and have separate relations for the counties and boroughs (e.g.
> Brooklyn
>   and Kings County), sharing the same ways.
> 
> Your proposal sounds entirely reasonable to me.  The notion that
> cities
> are contained within a county is baked into the hierarchical
> organization, and something has to give when that isn't true.  Letting
> the hierarchy not line up seems better than choosing different levels.
> 
> In the old way, there's the awkward question about how L5 should be
> rendered, and why it should look different than L8, and that's all
> unnnecessary mess.
> 
> Your proposal defers the interesting choice to the renderer, which is
> whether one cares about counties or boroughs, but such deferring is in
> my view a feature.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

-- 
John F. Eldredge -- john at jfeldredge.com
"Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20130518/b2b62904/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list