[Talk-us] Complex intersection mapping

[James Mast]

> From: martijnv at telenav.com
> Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 11:31:55 -0500
> To: rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com
> CC: stevec at telenav.com; kristenk at telenav.com; roberts at telenav.com; chrisz at telenav.com; talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Complex intersection mapping
> 
> James,
> 
> Thanks for the feedback. This is of course not good. I will make sure
> we will be more careful with both the lane counts and the relations
> not getting broken! I apologize. Did you fix the relations? If not I
> will.
> 

I hadn't yet since I wanted to wait till you responded on the list first so you could see what I was talking about (Changeset 18789658).

> The case you highlighted - I agree this one would be just fine as a
> single node.

That's how I'm going to repair that intersection & the relations that were effected, by just reverting Changeset 18789658 to return it to the way it was before yesterday.

> The guidance I have been giving, based on previous
> discussion in this thread, was to only 'dualize' the intersection when
> the dual carriageway clearly continues past the intersection. Does
> that make sense?

Yep, that does make perfect sense to me.  That's how I've personally been doing it.

>I will make sure we adhere to that guideline and not
> overcomplexify situations that don't require it from a ground trouth
> perspective.
> 
> Martijn

Sounds good Martijn.  Thanks again for responding back on this subject. :)  I'll now go ahead and do the revert of Changeset 18789658.

-James

 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20131109/75c1ff78/attachment.html>