[Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US & State highways.

[Paul Johnson]

I'm willing to extend this to any route whose endpoints are undivided.
Seems the problem we're ultimately dealing with are situations where a
route ends with a median of some type.
On Nov 18, 2013 2:42 PM, "Martin Koppenhoefer" <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> 2013/11/18 Nathan Mills <nathan at nwacg.net>
>
>> I'm still confused as to why the consumers of a relation can't use the
>> forward/backward roles of the ways referenced therein rather than requiring
>> completely separate relations. Why do we need two or more relations plus a
>> super relation per road route even for undivided highways? Even for a
>> somewhat experienced mapper like myself, it makes the editing process that
>> much more error prone.
>
>
> if the highway is never divided a single route would be sufficient (rather
> hard to find this situation probably), but if you have routes that even for
> a short way do not share the same geometry it will be easier to maintain
> and to check if every direction has its own relation (and IMHO less error
> prone).
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20131121/352e951d/attachment.html>