[Talk-us] Completing the Appalachian Trail relation

[Josh Doe]

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Richard Welty <rwelty at averillpark.net> wrote:
> [...]
> the data appears pretty good, the segment in Orange County
> NY that i just filled in meets up appropriately with previously
> mapped sections (presumably the result of OSM hikers with
> GPS units and where i looked at overlap, the variance was within
> expected norms for a GPS unit under foliage cover. this is
> decent data. the previously entered OSM data is also decent from
> what i can see, and should be retained. the AT GIS data should
> be treated as a gap filler and there is no reason to replace
> prior data.

I agree with you. What about attributes, anything useful we should
import when possible? I can't view the data now, but I believe I saw
SURFACE and CLUB which might be useful. A whole lot of unneeded GPS
info.

-Josh