[Talk-us] Completing the Appalachian Trail relation

[Richard Fairhurst]

Richard Welty wrote:
> Josh Doe wrote:
> > I believe I saw SURFACE and CLUB which might be
> > useful.
> i'm not keeping any of it, the source tag points back to 
> the original data set and that should be sufficient. [...]
> i don't know that i see a mapping from the AT surface
> attributes to our surface tag, and an AT:surface tag 
> would be largely ignored by OSM users

If you can find a mapping from the Trail surface to OSM surface= tags, or
even to tracktype= at a pinch, that'd be superb. I've just built a cycling
router (using OSRM) and surface tags make _all_ the difference. They're
something OSM greatly benefits from.

cheers
Richard





--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Completing-the-Appalachian-Trail-relation-tp5787477p5787521.html
Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.