[Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US & State highways.

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

2013/11/30 Peter Davies <peter.davies at crc-corp.com>

> So we have way ref I 394 instead of I 394;US 12.  For my applications I'd
> prefer it said I 394;US 12, because we need to track the overlaps (which we
> and our 10 state DOT customers call double banding).  But if you also want
> to suppress shields from maps in such areas, could we enter the way ref as
> I 394;US 12|unsigned  ?
>


Usually you would have (at least) 2 relations, one for each ref. The way
ref (if set at all) will often have multiple values, semicolon separated.
Not sure if you have a different agreement in the US, but it doesn't matter
if the ref is signed or not, as long as you can find it in some kind of
publicly available documentation (with compatible licensing).

cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20131130/806ec4e8/attachment.html>