[Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US & State highways.

[Richard Welty]

On 11/30/13 4:57 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:57 PM, James Mast
> <rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com <mailto:rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Peter, it would just be for the relations.  It would stay the
>     current status-quo for the ways using at all times the "ref &
>     unsigned_ref" tags (see I-394 example below).
>
>
> I can't wait until we can finally kill this dinosaur.  Refs, as
> they're presently tagged on ways, almost always apply to the route
> instead of the way.  And not to mention they're just a pain in the
> butt to maintain properly where multiplexes exist, something that
> works cleanly in relations.
>
we're kind of stuck with ref on the ways until the data
and data consumers come up to speed. there are a lot
of route relations still to be built in the US.

richard


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20131130/d64cd0a9/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 946 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20131130/d64cd0a9/attachment.pgp>