[Talk-us] Tagging Closed Roads

[Thomas Colson]

Another one:

http://tomnod.com/nod/challenge/coloradofloods2013

 

 

 

From: Mike Thompson [mailto:miketho16 at gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 1:04 PM
To: Russell Deffner
Cc: stevea; Evin Fairchild; Open Street Map Talk-US
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Tagging Closed Roads

 

Russ,

 

Thanks for taking action on this.

 

Mike

 

On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Russell Deffner <russdeffner at gmail.com>
wrote:

My apologies for messaging backward regarding the CO Floods and road
tagging.  I think I have gone back through the conversation and captured it
here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/2013_Colorado_Floods - I also added
my two cents of using damaged: or destroyed: key

As with wiki's please feel free to edit, I will have limited availability
this week but will try to contribute some mapping time (and look over the
wiki and talk list).

=Russ


-----Original Message-----
From: stevea [mailto:steveaOSM at softworkers.com]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 11:03 PM
To: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
Cc: Evin Fairchild
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Tagging Closed Roads

I suggest tags highway=proposed and/or highway=construction tags can
be used, depending on what you know and/or see (in that order).

If a section of washed-out road is an "island" that cannot be gotten
to, it might properly be tagged access=no.  Ditto for roads that are
still physically extant, but have been essentially "condemned" by,
say a municipality, county road department or state DOT.

In other words, OSM can excel here at exceedingly accurately
describing the state of the road network, right down to any
granularity or level of detail, whether still there and open, still
there but closed, gone but going to be rebuilt, or actually being
rebuilt.  There are other combinations, I'm sure:  tag appropriately!

SteveA
California


>If the road is washed out to the point where it is completely gone
>(as opposed to only part of it being washed out) and a new road
>would have to be rebuilt on a new route, I would just delete the
>segment of road that got washed out. The road isn't there now, so it
>should be shown as such in OSM.

_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20130921/87121513/attachment.html>