[Talk-us] South Carolina State Highways - primary overload

James Mast rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com
Sun Feb 2 04:04:53 UTC 2014


All right, I'll be sending the e-mail to the DWG in a few minutes then.  Life has been a little crazy here preventing me from doing it sooner than this.

-James

> From: martijn at openstreetmap.us
> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:07:48 -0800
> To: rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com
> CC: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] South Carolina State Highways - primary overload
> 
> I think you're making the right call, James.
> 
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:33 PM, James Mast <rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > So, nobody else has a comment on how the repair work should be done?
> >
> > Last chance before I respond back to the DWG e-mail (and as of right now,
> > will be recommending just the reverting of only the 'highway=xxx' upgrades).
> > Just want to make sure the masses don't have a problem with this.
> >
> > -James
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: rickmastfan67 at hotmail.com
> > To: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> > Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 05:01:19 -0500
> >
> > Subject: Re: [Talk-us] South Carolina State Highways - primary overload
> >
> > Nobody else has a comment on what should be done here?
> >
> > If you don't remember the start of this discussion of this subject, here's
> > the link to the original post I made on this subject to the list so you can
> > see it:
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2013-December/012349.html
> >
> > -James
> >
> >> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:24:50 -0500
> >> From: niceman at att.net
> >> To: talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] South Carolina State Highways - primary overload
> >>
> >> On 1/16/2014 12:16 AM, James Mast wrote:
> >> > Anyways guys, post what you think should be done here so I can get back
> >> > to the DWG on this subject. (I'm personally all for the reverting of
> >> > the highway=xxx upgrades this user has done only and not a full scale
> >> > revert of all his changesets as he did do some highway cleanup in some
> >> > changesets while doing the 'highway=xxx' upgrades.)
> >>
> >> I would be for the revert of the highway=xxx changes. While the Wiki
> >> has no hard and fast rule on the 'right way' to tag these, clearly some
> >> information has been lost by eliminating a highway type.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Talk-us mailing list
> >> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
> >
> > _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list
> > Talk-us at openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-us mailing list
> > Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Martijn van Exel
> President, US Chapter
> OpenStreetMap
> http://openstreetmap.us/
> http://osm.org/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20140201/7b495c7c/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list