[Talk-us] routing tags used by actual routing applications

[Paul Johnson]

Not necessarily.  The case I tend to run into, these are extremely rural
roads suitable only as a last resort (or for recreational rat runs across
The Big Empty) and tend to be prone to irregular maintenance, unevenly
graded, do not have snow removal, may have fords, variable in width and
tend to be prone to flooding.  That said, while many may be passable for
quite a distance in a low sedan at the speed limit (usually 45), this is by
no means a reliable assumption even under ideal conditions.
On Jul 3, 2014 10:37 AM, "Brad Neuhauser" <brad.neuhauser at gmail.com> wrote:

> Just trying to process this: wouldn't a tracktype 1 be tagged as
> unclassified or residential anyway?  Or to ask a different way, assuming
> that roads with houses should be tagged as residential, when should one tag
> a sub-tertiary road as track vs. using unclassified?
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Paul Norman <penorman at mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> For tracks, tracktype indicates condition, and tracktype1 should be
>>> drivable by any family sedan as it may even be paved.
>>
>>
>> This.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-us mailing list
>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20140703/39d79cf9/attachment.html>