[Talk-us] Who controls data: Google Maps, others erasing Hollywood sign, but it's in OSM

Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhauser at gmail.com
Thu Nov 27 17:04:05 UTC 2014


Could you include the new node in the relation as role=label? That's at
least somewhat documented...

On Thursday, November 27, 2014, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> 2014-11-26 18:30 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wiseman <awiseman at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','awiseman at gmail.com');>>:
>
>> That was me -- but I would argue it's an unusual way to tag it -- it's
>> not the individual letters that are important, it's the whole piece.
>
>
>
> yes, that is clear, and the data in OSM also reflected this by having a
> site relation to group all the letters into the actual monument. That
> relation is the object to put the name, wikipedia link, tourism=attraction
> tag etc. (and they are all there).
>
>
>
>> You wouldn't tag each president in Mount Rushmore and leave it at that,
>> right?
>
>
>
> I wouldn't leave it as that, but I also wouldn't tag them singularly and
> then add another node for the whole, I'd rather try to combine the
> "individual presidents" into a whole piece of artwork by using a relation.
>
>
> cheers,
> Martin
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20141127/113068db/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list