[Talk-us] Directional relation roles where signs disagree
baloo at ursamundi.org
Fri Sep 26 00:46:54 UTC 2014
With these split relations, ways should have forward/backwards, relations
should have cardinal directions in a super relation. Gets to be a real
pain in the ass when ways are using cardinal direction roles.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Minh Nguyen <minh at nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us>
> At least ten miles of I-275 near Cincinnati are consistently signed as
> north/southbound on guide signs  and reassurance markers  but
> consistently signed as east/westbound on tenth-mile markers  and ramp
> name signs, as well as in ODOT's straight line diagram .
> What roles should these ways have in the I-275 route relation? They're
> currently "north" and "south" with a note describing the contradiction. 
> Would it be better to change the roles to "north;east" and "south;west"?
> Should we revert to "forward" in weird cases like these? (It's bad enough
> that this is Circle Freeway, in which each direction already refers to
> disconnected segments in 2-3 different states.)
>  <http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ufaXmzVwXv5vWJM_PsDJtw>
>  <http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/nfX2M7XTTeHxSR7PvTVW3g>
>  <http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/HpzPH_tPp-x_A8WXBBCplA>
>  <http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/Planning/TechServ/
>  For example, <http://osm.org/way/31563007>
> minh at nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-us