[Talk-us] Great Lakes Boundaries

[David Fawcett]

Inland sea...



> On Apr 25, 2015, at 8:19 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Am 24.04.2015 um 17:23 schrieb AJ Ashton <aj.ashton at gmail.com>:
>> 
>> Yes, if Lake Superior is mapped as natural=coastline (which I think is the easier-to-maintain approach for such a large & complex water body) then we should remove natural=water from the multipolygon relation (r4039486). Does anyone have any objection to this? It's causing some noticeable rendering issues both in the standard style and for data consumers.
> 
> 
> yes, if the coastline tag remains it seems logical to remove the natural=water tag. Semantically the coastline tag on a freshwater lake is clearly wrong, but it seems to be an accepted compromise in this case: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline#What_about_lakes.3F
> 
> 
> cheers 
> Martin 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20150425/f67cbb92/attachment.html>