[Talk-us] Bike route relation issues

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Mon Jan 12 01:30:37 UTC 2015

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:54 PM, stevea <steveaOSM at softworkers.com> wrote:

> I do not agree:  again, I find no evidence (from the Oregon DOT map) that
> bicycles are explicitly designated "legal" on I-5.  It may be the case that
> explicit statute specifies bicycles are allowed on I-5 in Oregon, but this
> map does not explicitly do so.  Again, please note that no specific "bike
> routes" are designated on that map, either.  It simply displays some
> highways as Interstates and some highways as containing wide shoulders or
> narrow shoulders.  While not complaining about Oregon's DOT helping
> bicyclists better understand where they might or might not ride a bicycle
> in that state, I characterize these map data as "early" or "underdeveloped"
> w.r.t. helpful "bicycle routing" by a DOT.

Oregon and Washington allow all modes on all routes unless otherwise
posted.  They have to explicitly sign exclusions, and they do.  Here's the
list for Oregon


And Washington:

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20150111/4c9e8027/attachment.html>

More information about the Talk-us mailing list