[Talk-us] National Forest "nature_reserve"?

[Greg Troxel]

Mike Thompson <miketho16 at gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Russell Deffner <russell.deffner at hotosm.org>

>> Sorry I don’t follow this topic more closely but I would think with the
>> mixed-used of national forests, it is best to use boundary=protected_area

> After reading the wiki page Russ linked to, this seems correct as one of
> the sub-types is "Protected area with sustainable use of natural
> resources:" Along
> with leisure=nature_preserve the national forests in question are already
> also tagged with boundary=protected_area

So despite not liking the tag, I concur that this is reasonable given
existing standards.

So it sounds like just dropping leisure=nature_reserve fixes everything.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 180 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20150602/921540c2/attachment.sig>