[Talk-us] Fwd: Re: National Forest "nature_reserve"?
steveaOSM at softworkers.com
Fri Jun 5 17:20:47 UTC 2015
> Interesting discussion. But, I have one question. After all
>that, how do I code a national forest?
I continue to believe it is correct to tag landuse=forest on USFS
boundaries. And while I have tagged leisure=nature_reserve on
Wilderness boundaries in the past, I also agree that is becoming a
bit old-fashioned, especially in light of the newer protected_area
schema evolving. So while I don't believe that
leisure=nature_reserve is strictly wrong on Wilderness (yet), I agree
with Greg Troxel that landuse=conservation on Wilderness is better,
especially as it omits by exclusion the same tag (landuse) being set
to forest on Wilderness -- which truly is not forest.
As it is a newer tagging schema, I have begun additionally tagging
with boundary=protected_area and protect_class=1b on Wilderness. On
USFS boundaries, I add (to landuse=forest) boundary=protected_area
I also agree with this well-worded statement by Greg Troxel: "every
bit of land, eventually, should have a landuse= tag, and () landuse
values should have some sort of mutually exclusive and jointly
exhaustive coverage." His reasoning (consistency, "just read it,"
otherwise you have to know about protected_area subcases and infer
what landuse is) is spot on.
So, a landuse tag PLUS protected_area/protect_class tags seem to hold
us in good stead for the present. Tag forest and 6 for USFS and
conservation and 1b for Wilderness. However, do pay attention to
"subtle nuances" like "Protect classes for various countries" and the
evolution of change in this schema. The wiki is a rich source of
usually up-to-date documentation (and even has Discussion pages).
Of course, I'm no expert or ultimate authority, just another
volunteer paying attention to an evolving set of tags and new schemas
which attempt to do a better job of capturing accurate semantics in a
More information about the Talk-us