[Talk-us] cycle.travel US bike routing, and unreviewed rural TIGER
kliems at gmail.com
Fri Jun 19 20:46:48 UTC 2015
Richard, I would somewhat caution against penalizing unpaved roads too
much. In many areas of the US they actually make wonderful cycling routes,
whereas the paved alternatives are high traffic and unpleasant to ride on.
Of course, proper smoothness tagging would help but that will be a long way
coming. Until then you could consider a user setting to avoid/not avoid
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:48 PM Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net>
> Just as a postscript to this discussion I thought I'd cite an example area.
> If you look here, in Georgia:
> you'll see that most of the roads are unreviewed TIGER residentials. Of
> those, these are adjacent to each other:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9359782 - good tarmac, should be
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9359913 - unpaved road;
> highway=unclassified, surface=unpaved
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9359784 - probably tertiary, but lousy
> geometry at the S
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9359783 - whoops, where did the
> connectivity go?
> All of this is trivially fixable but right now there's no way of using them
> for routing or sensible cartography. Do dive in - the cycle.travel
> makes it obvious which bits need fixing, and you learn to identify the
> which are likely to be paved through roads and therefore targets to fix.
> It's quite good fun. :)
> View this message in context:
> Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-us