[Talk-us] Wählen / Voting - Sanitary Dump Station

[Paul Johnson]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:29 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> A caravan site might have 200 private hookups. We don't want the hookups
>>> to be rendered at the same level as the central dump station.
>>> Backyard dump stations should render even less prominently, if they are
>>> even mapped at all.
>>>
>>
>> Let's not forget that tagging isn't the renderer.  If a renderer can't
>> dim or hide access=private on such a POI when it's not desirable to display
>> a private sanidump, it's the renderer, not the tagging, that's broken.
>>
>
> Let's not forget that humans are mappers.  The shared sanidump at the
> local caravan site might well get tagged access=private.
>

That's something that can be fixed.


> Or maybe access=private will be used for the per site hookups.
>

Right (or customers).


> *The cases seem to be:*
> private backyard dump stations.
> per-site hookup, available only to registered residents (at a long term
> residential trailer park or dock).
> per-site hookup, available only to registered guests at a leisure
> destination
>

access=private for all three.


> shared dump station, available only to guests of the destination
>

access=customers


> shared dump station, available for drive up/boat up use.
> shared dump station, free.
>

access=yes (or just no access tag at all).


> *Tagged on:*
> Way/node
>
As a tagged property of a mapped place (e.g. campground, store, fuel
> station), without a specific position.
>

Probably not as this is almost certainly too vague.


> As a tagged property of a numbered slot (e.g. sites 1-22 offer per-site
> hookups).
>

Reasonable, as it's often hard to get high enough imagery to narrow it down
further and most people (I'm certainly not and I probably care more than
most) aren't likely to break out the theodolite and start doing trig...


> Each of those cases needs clear tags if we hope mappers to use them
> consistently.  Your suggestions?
>

I think not trying to redefine access=* for just this situation is a start.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20150317/dded2177/attachment-0001.html>