[Talk-us] Removing a CDP

[Steven Johnson]

Yes, U.S. Census Bureau treats them as statistical, not aim boundaries. 

--SEJ

Sent from my electronic tether. 

On 2015年5月19日, at 21:33, stevea <steveaOSM at softworkers.com> wrote:

>> On 5/19/15 Richard Welty <rwelty at averillpark.net> wrote:
>> they probably shouldn't be in an administrative boundary category anyway,
>> as they don't have any sort of local governance function.
> 
> Agreed, +1.  I've been similarly locally blurring out (away from importance or relevance in OSM) and/or diminishing CDP boundaries as I do listen here.
> 
> Many of these are in OSM yet they might be seen as they are, especially as/when combined with administrative boundary.  In short, census delineations are not administrative, rather, more like a statistical approximation.  What that particular census formula purports to denote might be debated, though that seems tedious.
> 
> At a certain point we start to do cartwheels around Monte Carlo simulations regarding Constitutional questions getting asked.  Let's check that and continue.
> 
> SteveA
> California
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us