[Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Sat Oct 3 17:49:23 UTC 2015


On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Minh Nguyen <minh at nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us>
wrote:

> On 2015-10-03 07:45, Mike Thompson wrote:
>
>>
>> By removing access=private you would be removing a valuable piece of
>> information. Maybe the community can come up with a better tag, but we
>> should not just delete the "private" tag.
>>
>
> How do people here feel about using access=destination on driveways that
> aren't posted? It more or less captures "who is allowed", if not "who owns
> the road". The tag is designed for streets posted with "no through traffic"
> signs, but that's pretty much what's been described in this thread.


That would imply that it is a public driveway, but not one that allows
through traffic.  Not the right use of the tag.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20151003/21e64208/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list