[Talk-us] Check your turn:lanes
burkejf3 at gmail.com
Wed Aug 24 23:52:33 UTC 2016
No, it's https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/193
And they appear to be telling me that the combination "none;slight_right"
Also, in their reply to me, they do specifically mention that they know
none is valid, yet they're replacing it anyway. And the worst part of it
is that while they're using a script to *find* what they think is invalid,
they're *manually* making the changes.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Hans De Kryger <hans.dekryger13 at gmail.com>
> The link Jack's talking about,
> On Aug 24, 2016 4:09 PM, "Toby Murray" <toby.murray at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Mind sharing the link to the GitHub issue?
>> Do they think that "none" is an invalid option and are replacing it
>> with a blank globally? If so, this should be shut down immediately.
>> "none" and blank are both valid values and while I wouldn't mind
>> seeing it be consistent, any such edit would need to be discussed
>> before it is done.
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Jack Burke <burkejf3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > An active OSM group (leaving names, etc. out while they check out what I
>> > reported) is running a script or plug-in or challenge called "to-fix"
>> > is apparently supposed to help fix incorrect turn:lanes values (and
>> > other things, I haven't investigated deeply enough).
>> > The problem is, it's breaking the values instead. I found a section of
>> > that I'd added turn:lanes to in order to provide lane guidance at an
>> > My original value of "none|none|none|none|none;slight_right" was
>> replaced by
>> > "||||slight_right".
>> > While, per the wiki, there's nothing particularly wrong with a null
>> > for a field vs. specifying "none" as the value, it *does* make a
>> > when there are two values in the field, as in my example above. They
>> > a continue-on-or-exit lane into an exit-only lane.
>> > So if you find broken lane guidance like that, with empty fields where
>> > "none" would also be appropriate, that's probably what happened. Check
>> > history on the way and see if you can backtrack what happened
>> > the group involved here included a url to a github issue where they are
>> > tracking what they're doing).
>> > Now I have 200 miles of Interstate to go back through and re-check.
>> > --jack
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Talk-us mailing list
>> > Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>> Talk-us mailing list
>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-us