[Talk-us] [Talk-ca] Ferry durations

m at rtijn.org m at rtijn.org
Wed Jul 12 20:27:42 UTC 2017

There were a few that one of my colleague added yesterday (look for *_telenav user names in the metadata, example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10853579 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10853579> ) So if that completes the picture, great. If you want to check for other provinces, just replace the name in the overpass query.

There is a discussion thread emerging around tagging these durations that split off in talk-us. If you’re interested and not subscribed there I can cc this list again.


> On Jul 12, 2017, at 2:03 PM, Alan Richards <alarobric at gmail.com> wrote:
> Are there any ferry routes without duration left? That overpass query shows all the common ferry routes I know offhand in the province.
> Alan
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:57 AM, <m at rtijn.org <mailto:m at rtijn.org>> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Just to let you know, my map team colleagues have been adding a few `duration` tags to ferry routes in BC yesterday. Since this was already established practice, I am only mentioning it now. I am crossposting to talk-us because I wanted to see if folks there have given any thought to ferry duration tagging? The documented practice is to add duration=hh:mm to the way that makes up the ferry route. If you think this is fun to map I could add ferry routes without duration to MapRoulette.
> Here is the current state of duration tags in BC: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qlE <http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qlE>
> Martijn
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20170712/0bce51cd/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Talk-us mailing list