[Talk-us] Open survey on participation biases in OSM
Joel Holdsworth
joel at airwebreathe.org.uk
Tue Sep 5 20:35:25 UTC 2017
> A simpler explanation would be that women are simply interested in other
> past-times. And what's wrong with that?
*On average* women are simply interested in other past-times. And what's
wrong with that?
--- groan that I have to put that caveat in, or people will twist your
words.
On 05/09/17 14:32, Joel Holdsworth wrote:
>
>> The ultimate goal for OSM should be a project which everyone feels
>> welcome to be a part of, and which does not have a noticeable bias
>> towards either gender or any given race. Also, please realize just
>> because women are welcome to participate in OSM, does not necessarily
>> mean that some women will *feel* they are welcome.
>>
>
> But exactly how is the project unwelcoming? How could the "Edit" button
> be welcoming to men and not women?
>
> I didn't even know the map had strip-clubs or childcare in it - and I've
> been contributing for 10-years, so this clearly isn't an explanation for
> the gender percentages we have.
>
> A simpler explanation would be that women are simply interested in other
> past-times. And what's wrong with that?
>
> Joel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list