[Talk-us] Trunk versus motorway

Evin Fairchild evindfair at gmail.com
Sun Dec 2 23:04:01 UTC 2018


You are proving my point once again re misrepresentation of what we're
saying. It would only be accurate for you to say that we're going against
federal guidelines is if we were to say that the motorway should continue
thru the at grade intersection. None of us are saying that!

I'm really getting frustrated with the way you're deliberately
misrepresenting this discussion, so frankly I'm going to bow out since I
don't know what else to say to convince you to change your opinion on this
issue.

On Sun, Dec 2, 2018, 2:55 PM Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 4:30 PM Evin Fairchild <evindfair at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Once again, I see you're misrepresenting the discussion and trying to
>> make us look like a bunch of idiots for not accepting your way of doing
>> things. There's no way you're so dense as to assume that because we pretty
>> much all want the motorway designation to extend all the way to the first
>> at grade intersection, we think roads with at grade intersections can be
>> classified as motorways.
>>
>
>  There's no reason to get personally derogatory on this.  Where's the
> problem with limiting motorway to what generally meets federal guidelines
> on what constitutes a freeway?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20181202/85a99c01/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list