[Talk-us] Maximum number of tasks on US tasker

Jack Burke burkejf3 at gmail.com
Wed May 9 15:53:59 UTC 2018


I add lanes=2 (or other, as appropriate) even when they aren't striped.  If
striping is going to be a requirement, how "fresh" does it have to be?  I
see quite a few roads where you can tell that striping once existed because
of some barely-visible remnants in spots....

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:

> Right, we're only counting striped lanes.
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Jack Burke <burkejf3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> But they *are* lanes. They just aren't striped.
>>
>> -jack
>> --
>> Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology
>>
>>
>> On May 8, 2018 3:24:08 PM EDT, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> The tag you're looking for is width, not lanes.
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 8, 2018, 13:29 Tod Fitch <tod at fitchdesign.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Most residential roads in my area are unstriped but are definitely
>>>> built for two lanes of traffic (one in each direction). It seems perfectly
>>>> reasonable to me to tag them with lanes=2 as they are designed to take two
>>>> lanes of traffic.
>>>>
>>>> In fact, as part of some traffic calming measures a number of
>>>> residential roads are having the lane striping removed. They claim that
>>>> people tend to drive slower if there is no marking showing the boundary for
>>>> oncoming traffic. I certainly will not be removing lanes=2 from those roads.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > On May 8, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Mike N <niceman at att.net> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > On 5/8/2018 11:55 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>>> >> Then with residential streets where there are no lanes, often
>>>> lanes=2 would get tagged anyway despite nothing on the ground suggesting
>>>> that was actually the case.
>>>> >
>>>> >  I hadn't considered that unstriped roads shouldn't have lane
>>>> tagging, but at least this doesn't cause bad effects for map data users.
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Talk-us mailing list
>>>> > Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>>>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-us mailing list
>>>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>>>
>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20180509/caac4c78/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list