[Talk-us] Maximum number of tasks on US tasker
Paul Johnson
baloo at ursamundi.org
Wed May 9 15:59:57 UTC 2018
Depends on the situation, I don't mess with it if I don't know the area
that well, but if I'm vaguely familiar with maintenance norms in the area
and the context of the road, I'll tag the lanes as best I can if it's
likely still being maintained as a multilane road, but if it's been
downgraded to something without lanes and they're letting it go, I'll tag
that accordingly.
On Wed, May 9, 2018, 10:54 Jack Burke <burkejf3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I add lanes=2 (or other, as appropriate) even when they aren't striped.
> If striping is going to be a requirement, how "fresh" does it have to be?
> I see quite a few roads where you can tell that striping once existed
> because of some barely-visible remnants in spots....
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
>
>> Right, we're only counting striped lanes.
>>
>> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Jack Burke <burkejf3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> But they *are* lanes. They just aren't striped.
>>>
>>> -jack
>>> --
>>> Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 8, 2018 3:24:08 PM EDT, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The tag you're looking for is width, not lanes.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 8, 2018, 13:29 Tod Fitch <tod at fitchdesign.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Most residential roads in my area are unstriped but are definitely
>>>>> built for two lanes of traffic (one in each direction). It seems perfectly
>>>>> reasonable to me to tag them with lanes=2 as they are designed to take two
>>>>> lanes of traffic.
>>>>>
>>>>> In fact, as part of some traffic calming measures a number of
>>>>> residential roads are having the lane striping removed. They claim that
>>>>> people tend to drive slower if there is no marking showing the boundary for
>>>>> oncoming traffic. I certainly will not be removing lanes=2 from those roads.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > On May 8, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Mike N <niceman at att.net> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 5/8/2018 11:55 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>>>> >> Then with residential streets where there are no lanes, often
>>>>> lanes=2 would get tagged anyway despite nothing on the ground suggesting
>>>>> that was actually the case.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I hadn't considered that unstriped roads shouldn't have lane
>>>>> tagging, but at least this doesn't cause bad effects for map data users.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > Talk-us mailing list
>>>>> > Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>>>>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Talk-us mailing list
>>>>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20180509/a7f42924/attachment.html>
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list