[Talk-us] Drop the tiger:reviewed tag from roads

[Martijn van Exel]

Very true Mike. There is still some value in detecting TIGER roads that
are in 'original' state. For example, if you can detect a cluster of
'unmodified' TIGER roads, that would point to an area entirely untouched
by human editors.
I write 'original' and 'unmodified' in quotes, because a number of
bots have touched most TIGER imported ways, so TIGER ways having
version=1 are rare.--
  Martijn van Exel
  m at rtijn.org



On Fri, May 11, 2018, at 11:44, Mike Thompson wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Martijn van Exel
> <m at rtijn.org> wrote:>> __
>>  As long as there is at least one tag left that would indicate TIGER
>>  as the original source, so we can continue to detect 'unmodified
>>  TIGER' roads.>> -
> Just because a TIGER road has been modified doesn't mean it has been
> verified, for example if you add a side street you will probably have
> to add a shared node at its intersection with the road in question,
> and that would bump the version - meaning it is now "modified" even
> though the mapper may not have reviewed the entire length of the TIGER
> road.  Conversely, just because a TIGER road is still at version 0,
> doesn't mean it hasn't been verified as existing nodes that make up
> the way can be moved without bumping the version on the way.> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20180511/6992bd35/attachment-0001.html>