[Talk-us] TIGER place confusion
jleedev at gmail.com
Thu Sep 27 13:05:16 UTC 2018
Use border_type=* for this. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:border_type
Usage is spotty at best but it looks fairly consistent to me. For
example in Pennsylvania admin_level=8 can have a border_type of city,
township, borough, municipality(?), or town (there's just one "town").
In New York admin_level=7 can have a border_type of town or city, but
I'm only seeing this on two cities and about a third of the towns.
Since a combo admin+place has both a boundary and a label node, is
there a rule of thumb for what tags go where? Does place=whatever go
on both? What about wikidata?
(?) border_type=municipality definitely came from TIGER, as it matches
Bethel Park, Monroeville, and Murrysville having an LSAD of
municipality. Pennsylvania's classification of home rule
municipalities is a bit fuzzy, since it's *also* still considered to
be a township or borough. I'll leave that one alone for now.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 7:50 AM Max Erickson <maxerickson at gmail.com> wrote:
> Many of the administrative boundaries imported from TIGER have a
> place= tag that reflects the legal type of incorporation of the
> municipality rather than a sensible value for the OSM place tag (which
> would give some hint about the relative prominence of the place).
> This confusion has gone under the radar, as openstreetmap-carto
> doesn't render place labels from ways and relations:
> Deleting the imported place= values (or perhaps moving them to some
> other tag, say something like incorporation=) would directly make the
> data more accurate and improve maps that render place areas without
> accounting for the confusion in the data.
> What do people think about deleting (or adjusting) the place tag from
> imported US administrative boundaries?
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Talk-us