[Talk-us] Michigan Forest Land

[Kevin Kenny]

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019, 10:17 Max Erickson <maxerickson at gmail.com> wrote:

> The compartments likely aren't the right data for a general purpose
> map; I'm not entirely sure, but they seem to be the basic management
> unit for state forest land, so when they consider a cut or whatever
> they consider it for that area. For OSM, the right things is probably
> to have individual objects for each state forest, game area, park,
> etc.
>
> Complicating things, the state seems to have moved away from saying
> much about the top level state forests. But I think they are probably
> still the right thing for a general purpose map.
>

Right. That's why I was talking about coalescing compartments that have the
same management type and name. The table in my earlier message shows the
number of compartments to be combined for each facility.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20190313/03644efc/attachment.html>