[Talk-us] National Forests and Private Ownership

[Mike Thompson]

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 2:28 PM Bradley White <theangrytomato at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Yes I understand that, that is what the landuse tag is for. Private
> land should tagged as private. Public land should be tagged as public.
> The 'access' tag is probably preferable for this, and it's what I use.
> My point is that none of this involves the NF boundary, and to please
> leave it alone because it's a pain to fix problems with it.
>
I understand and generally agree.  One point is that the NFS may have made
arrangements with the landowner such that some access by the public is
permitted.  I say this because an official USFS trail (Crosier Mountain
Trail)[1] crosses private land and there are no signs saying "No
Trespassing"

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49458204
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20191015/2d061042/attachment.html>