[Talk-us] Import of addresses for San Francisco, CA

[Yury Yatsynovich]

I see. Thanks for clarifying, Russell!

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 3:33 PM Russell Nelson <nelson at crynwr.com> wrote:

> It was an experiment, to see how accurate the three methods could be.
> That road, and many around it, are not completely built-out. When a new
> building is built on an empty parcel, it will have an address
> immediately.  When a new address is assigned to a new (split out)
> parcel, the interpolation will give it an address immediately.
>
> On 6/18/20 3:19 PM, Yury Yatsynovich wrote:
> > Oh, wow!
> > Maybe that's fine, but to me it looks like duplicated info. As far as
> > I understand, extrapolation lines are needed in areas where buildings
> > are not mapped yet and, hence, the extrapolation/approximate location
> > of the address is the best one can get. If the address is precisely
> > assigned to a building, why would one need the same address on the
> > extrapolation line? But, again, that's just my opinion and maybe I'm
> > overlooking something important.
>


-- 
Yury Yatsynovich
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20200618/352783cb/attachment-0001.htm>