[Talk-us] place=neighborhood on subdivisions?

[Paul Johnson]

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:20 PM Mike N <niceman at att.net> wrote:

> On 9/22/2020 8:56 PM, Karson Sommer wrote:
> >
> > Looking around the area of the edit, there is a lot of stuff from my
> > perspective that seems fishy. There are a bunch of place=hamlet nodes? I
> > certainly don't see anything that should be tagged as a hamlet, they all
> > look like place=neighborhood to me. Each of these nodes should be mapped
> > onto an explicit residential area.
>
>    The extra hamlet nodes are import remainders that haven't yet been
> converted to landuse areas.   The general landuse zones for that area
> have been identified, but do not exactly correspond to the named
> subdivisions.   As I get a chance to survey, I divide the landuse into
> subdivisions and convert the node to a named area for the subdivision.
>

Please don't expand these as landuse, please expand them as
place=neighborhood instead.  Landuse polygons should be congruent to the
actual land use.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20200922/3b198e8c/attachment-0001.htm>