[Talk-us] Change sets covering entire US?

[Cj Malone]

On Mon, 2021-11-08 at 08:14 -0700, Mike Thompson wrote:
> > I don't have a problem with the large size of the bounding box, as
> > it
> is
> > clear from the changeset description what the change is, and it is
> > topically consistent (i.e. - it's not a changeset with a park in
> > New
> York,
> > an ice cream shop in Albuquerque, and a river in St. Louis!).
> > 
> I do have a problem with the large changeset bounding box, although
> without
> the large bbox this changeset - that is problematic for additional
> reasons
> - wouldn't have come to our attention.

I don't have an issues with large bboxes in this context.

At a certain point dividing up changesets is actually obscuring things
and making it harder to understand what is happening. I think we need a
middle point, and I believe that should be automated edits. 1 changeset
makes it easier to see, easier to discus, easier to validate and easier
to revert.